USPTO serial 75121635
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
68200 Mulhouse, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD A. LEHMAN
EDWARD A LEHMAN HILL STEADMAN & SIMPSON PC85TH FL SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | textile machines, namely, machines for dying carpet yarns | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |