USPTO serial 75121802
NANOFLUIDICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NANOFLUIDICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORS OFAMERICA PC915 BROADWAY 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010-4108Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | devices for use in electrophoretic applications, namely, assay and separation plates, cards and cassettes and kits containing these plates, cards and cassettes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| May 17, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |