Drawing for SPORTSPOWER

USPTO serial 75122888

SPORTSPOWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAUTERBACH, JODI
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPORTSPOWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clement Cheng, Esq.

Clement Cheng, Esq. Newhope Law, PC17220 Newhope St Ste 127Fountain Valley, CA 92708UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028import and export services for sporting goods, exercise equipment and accessoriesABANDONEDApr 18, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Jul 24, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Jun 5, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 15, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance