USPTO serial 75122986
INFOSHIP: THE NEXT CHAPTER IN DESKTOP PUBLISHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARMINE, F. D.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFOSHIP: THE NEXT CHAPTER IN DESKTOP PUBLISHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
#04-00, 0718, SG, SG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack Russo
JACK RUSSO RUSSO & HALE401 FLORENCE STPALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software programs which allow the user to add data to storage media, namely, for creating, revising, displaying, performing and distributing publications in an interactive, three-dimensional environment which integrates text, graphics, photographs, video, and other multimedia elements and related user manuals sold together as a unit | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |