USPTO serial 75123524
HYDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cardiff, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. John Campaign
H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN PC36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | building construction services, and repair services in connection therewith; maintenance and repair of machinery, electrical apparatus, and power supply networks used in building construction | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | power supply services, namely, the transmission of electricity, and the transmission of gas through pipelines; storage and freight forwarding | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | providing information in relation to the treatment of water, waste, sewage and effluent; waste treatment; water treatment; recycling of waste and trash | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consulting services in relation to the treatment of water, waste, sewage and effluent; design consultancy in the fields of building, construction, cvil engineering, electricity and gas supply and distribution; engineering consultancy; industrial design; engineering drawing; construction drafting; ecology surveys and research; geology surveying; technical consultancy in the fields of building, construction, civil engineering, electricity and gas supply and distribution; underwater exploration; architectural design; material testing; bacteriological research; chemical analysis; soil analysis; infrastructural design consultancy in the fields of building, construction, civil engineering, electricity and gas supply and distribution; landscape gardening; environmental evaluation; preparation of pollution reports for others; conducting feasibility studies, and preparing reports thereon for others; engineering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |