Drawing for FRESH BREEZE

USPTO serial 75123712

FRESH BREEZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRUNDY, JUDITH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FRESH BREEZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LISA A. PIERONI

CYNTHIA R CAIN GORSUCH KIRGIS LLPTWR I STE 10001515 ARAPAHOE STDENVER, CO 80202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003floor cleaning preparation for industrial and commercial useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2000ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 28, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 28, 2000OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Dec 16, 1999ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 16, 1999OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 16, 1999OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 20, 1998OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 20, 1998OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 24, 1997ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 15, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance