Drawing for INVOICENET

USPTO serial 75124336

INVOICENET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OWCZARSKI, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INVOICENET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID O JOHANSON

DAVID O JOHANSON BINGHAM DANA & GOULD LLP150 FEDERAL STBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035invoicing services in the field of publications via a global computer network; bill payment services via a global computer networkACTIVE
042computerized on-line ordering services for purchasing publications via a global computer networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 15, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 1, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 1, 1999REINREINSTATED
Dec 16, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 3, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 14, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 16, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 16, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 23, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 25, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance