USPTO serial 75124767
GRIM REAPERCUSSIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRIM REAPERCUSSIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay S. Kopelowitz
JAY S KOPELOWITZ DECICCO KOPELOWITZ & QUINNKOLL CTR501 W BROADWAY STE 2090SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3548Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing apparel, namely, shirts, T-shirts, jerseys, sweatshirts, sweatpants, tank tops, vests, jackets, shorts, pants, underwear, boxer shorts, swim suits, robes, hats, footwear, sweat bands | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | elbow pads for athletic use, knee pads for athletic use; sunglasses; boxing helmets; hockey helmets; boxing gloves; hockey gloves; hockey sticks; snow boards; skateboards; and in-lin skates | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |