USPTO serial 75124841
WEBEXCELERATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEBEXCELERATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN C WILLSIE
JOHN C WILLSIE GREENE RADOVSKY MALONEY & SHARE LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 4000SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4106UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software components which together comprise an Internet based software solution which provides complete multimedia interactive sales capability for unassisted sales and electronic commerce across the World Wide Web; the individual software components include multimedia presentations, automated questionnaires, and customer-friendly configurations which enable customers to prequalify themselves and independently configure product and service solutions that meet their individual needs | ABANDONED | Mar 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1998 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |