USPTO serial 75124945
INTERNET INCORPORATORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 21, 2003
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTERNET INCORPORATORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Garrett Sutton
Garrett Sutton Garrett Sutton Law Center, PC34 Mill StReno, NV 89501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | legal services, namely, formation of corporation, establishment of resident agents and office and headquarters for corporations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 11, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sierra Holdings Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Sierra Holdings Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Wickford Equities, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTERNET INCORPORATORS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | โ |
| Oct 9, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | โ |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | โ |
| Jun 16, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Apr 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Feb 18, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Jan 21, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Aug 28, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Aug 14, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | โ |
| May 14, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline โ usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Aug 26, 1999 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | โ |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Oct 26, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| May 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Oct 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jan 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |