USPTO serial 75125078
PHANTOMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3329777Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 6, 2007
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PHANTOMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
EMMAUS, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT B. SCHWARTZ
SCOTT B SCHWARTZ COZEN O'CONNOR1900 MARKET STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3508UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | accessories, namely, earrings and ornamental lapel pins | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2006 |
| 026 | accessories, namely, ornamental novelty buttons; ornamental novelty pins; and hair twists, namely, hair ornaments in the nature of fabric covered elasticized hair holders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Philadelphia Phantoms, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by PAHL, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Philadelphia Phantoms, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Philadelphia Phantoms, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by PHANTOMS HOCKEY, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named PHANTOMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |