USPTO serial 75126032
INTERNOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANA, JAMES L.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERNOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1071 LL Amsterdam, NL
1071 LL Amsterdam, NL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | installation of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | technical consulting in the selection, development, installation, and use of network systems; computer programming for others; computer engineering; technical consulting in the fields of computer programming, computer development, and computer engineering; maintenance of computer software; development of new computer hardware and software products for others, which hardware and software deals specifically with network systems; and providing technical assistance in the form of a help desk accessible by others for assisting in the installation of computer software for stand alone and network computer systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 28, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |