USPTO serial 75126814
MEGA SELECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEGA SELECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK H. TIDMAN
MARK H TIDMAN BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | automobile dealership services | ACTIVE | Nov 8, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 3, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 3, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |