USPTO serial 75126984
CACHETTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCNUTT, GEOFF
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CACHETTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
75 008 Paris, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | toilet soap, perfume, eau de cologne, toilet water, essential oils for personal use; face and body milks, lotions, creams, gels, emulsions, lipsticks, foundation make-up creams and powders, tinted creams, mascara, eyeshawdows, cosmetic pencils and powders, make-up removing lotions, creams, milks and gels; nail-polish; non-medicated creams, gels, oils and salts for the bath; talcum powder and body perfumed powders; shaving preparations; shaving foaming creams and gels; deodorants for personal use; sprays, gels, creams, shampoos and lotions for the hair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |