USPTO serial 75127462
SUGAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUGAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony B. Diepenbrock
ANTHONY B DIEPENBROCK TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | snack food items, namely, roasted dried beans, dried sugar beets, dried beans in chip form, vegetable fibers in wafer form, salad in dried bar form, fruits and vegetables in jerky form, and bar form, and fruits and vegetables which are made by the processes of osmovac, extrusion, infusion, and vacuum fry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |