USPTO serial 75128368
THE CHOICE IS CLEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OTTE, SARAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CHOICE IS CLEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Kilyk
LYNN A TANNEHILL LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYERTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601-6780UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | hand operated vacuum and pressure pumps and kits therefor, namely, cooling system kit comprised of dual converter pump, radiator adapter, temperature probe, tubing and carrying case; automotive component test kit comprised of vacuum and pressure pump, reservoir jar, transfer and storage lids, brake bleeding adapters, automotive test adapters, rubber cup adapters, vacuum gauge, tubing and carrying case; leakdown checker kit comprised of vacuum and pressure pumps, leakdown gauge, spark plug adapter, tubing and carrying case, turbocharger functions kit comprised of dual converter pump, vacuum and pressure gauge, rubber cup adapter, automotive test adapters, and tubing; accessories for hand-operated vacuum and pressure pumps, namely, dual converters, adapters, triggers, vacuum releases, diesel cup adapters, radiator and radiator cap adapters, vacuum line plugs and tees, liquid transferers, and automatic fluid feeders | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | compression testers; vacuum, pressure and compound gauges; fuel and pump testers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |