USPTO serial 75128731
CAPTIGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAPTIGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dermatological products, namely, topical medications for the prevention and/or treatment of skin irritations; skin protection products, namely, antibiotic body, hand and skin washes; and medicinal and dermatological treatments and applications, namely, antibiotic ointments, dermatologicals, medicated skin and body lotions, and medicated skin care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 27, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |