Drawing for FABWEL

USPTO serial 75132467

FABWEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FABWEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terence J. Linn

TERENCE J LINN VAN DYKE, GARDNER, LINN & BURKHART, LLPSTE 2072851 CHARLEVOIX DR S EGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49588-8695

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040plastic molding services, namely, molding plastic partsACTIVENov 1, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 2, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 2, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 3, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 6, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 7, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 7, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 27, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance