USPTO serial 75132574
D2K
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MENARD, MARLENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with D2K?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Jose, CA
San Jose, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for data analysis and movement between computer platforms both on a scheduled and ad hoc basis; computer software for building and maintaining data warehouses and data marts; computer software for automating the management, extraction, transformation, loading and analysis of data from data warehouses, from data marts and from operational and other databases; computer software for facilitating the delivery and use of data and information from data warehouses, data marts and operational and other databases; computer software for facilitating the creation of custom reports from data and information from data warehouses, data marts and operational and other databases; and user manuals supplied therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |