USPTO serial 75132681
AVENUE [BY DESIGN]
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAVONESE, DANIEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AVENUE [BY DESIGN]?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MITCHELL E RADIN
MITCHELL E RADIN COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP40 W 57TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | sunglasses, sunglass cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | pins being jewelry, ornamental pins, jewelry lapel pins, broaches | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | bags, namely, handbags, all purpose sport bags, purses, tote bags, duffle bags, overnight bags, wallet on a string bags, back packs, sling bags, macrame bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | canvas garment bags for storage | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | women's apparel, namely, dresses, blouses, jackets, pants, tops, tee shirts, blouses, vests, turtlenecks, tank tops, tunics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Avenue, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Avenue, Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named AVENUE [BY DESIGN]
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |