Drawing for WILD JUICES

USPTO serial 75132841

WILD JUICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILD JUICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032fruit juicesACTIVE
035retail juice bars featuring fruit juices and fruit smoothiesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 20, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 3, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jul 30, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 3, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Mar 26, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 26, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 31, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 5, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 18, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 10, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 21, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 6, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance