USPTO serial 75133073
DAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martha L. Boden
MARTHA L BODEN HESLIN & ROTHENBERG, PC5 COLUMBIA CIRALBANY, NY 12203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | optoelectronics devices using electronic signals, such as radio signals and digital signals to control and manipulate light for information handling purposes, namely, modulators, optical modulators, fiber optic modlators, transmitters, fiber optic transmitters, communications links, filters, tunable filters, fiber optic tunable filters, switches, optical switches, fiber optic switches, switching fabrics, crossbar switches, optical crossbar switches, integrated optics, optoelectronic integrated circuits, photonic integrated circuits, multiplexers, add-drop multiplexers, amplifiers, optical amplifiers, fiber optic amplifiers, parametric optical amplifiers, spatial light modulators, optical sensors, and microwave sensors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |