USPTO serial 75133237
THE K
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAVONESE, DANIEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE K?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIDGE M HYMAN
MIDGE M HYMAN WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER787 SEVENTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019-6099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, shirts, caps, shorts, dresses, skirts, T-shirts, jogging suits, warm-up suits, underwear, jackets, sweaters, vests, pants, ponchos, visors, bodysuits, raincoats, hats, overalls, cloth bibs, textile infant diaper covers, cloth diaper sets with undershirt and diaper cover, jumpers, rompers, uniforms, uniform jerseys, wind resistant jackets, baby booties, short sets, leotards, unitards, ties, bowties, neckties, suspenders, cummerbunds, pajamas, nightshirts, nightgowns; sweatpants, sweatshirts, mittens, gloves, knitted headwear, earmuffs, scarves, footwear, thongs (footwear), hosiery, socks, wristbands, headbands, robes, shoes, slippers, chef's hats, aprons, clothing wrap, sliding girdles, leg warmers, swimwear, berets, bandannas, and money belts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kansas City Royals Baseball Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Kansas City Royals Baseball Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named THE K
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |