USPTO serial 75133492
THE METRO CHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE METRO CHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Weisbein
ROBERT S WEISBEIN DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | pay television programming services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAINBOW PROGRAMMING HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RAINBOW PROGRAMMING HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE METRO CHANNEL
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |