USPTO serial 75134697
MULTIPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTIPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WESTMOUNT, Quebec H3Z 3C1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELISABETH A. LANGWORTHY
ELISABETH A LANGWORTHY SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP1275 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2415UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | floor coverings, namely, carpets, carpet undercushions, rugs, bath rugs and bath rug accessories, namely, toilet seat covers, toilet tank covers, toilet contour floor mats, bath mats and scatter rugs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |