USPTO serial 75134955
PRO SEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WARD, JOYCE A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRO SEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul B. Gaynor
PAUL B GAYNOR THE THOMPSON-MINWAX COMPANY10 MOUNTAINVIEW RDUPPER SADDLE RIVER, NJ 07458UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | waterproofing preparations for porous materials and as a bond breaking compound in concrete construction, concentrated waterproofing compounds for concrete, metal and wood surfaces; chemical waterproofing chemicals which prevent mold, mildew and wood rot and helps to prevent fading and greying | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 12, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |