USPTO serial 75135056
BUILDING BETTER FOR LESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2146832Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 24, 1998
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BUILDING BETTER FOR LESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
N. Canton, OH
UNIONTOWN, OH
DALLAS, TX
N. Canton, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Loree Conrad
Loree Conrad Centex Corporation6th Floor2728 N. HarwoodDallas, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | construction services, namely, planning, laying out and construction of residential and commercial communities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 16, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Artistry in Homebuilding
- Other trademarks owned by NEW NV CO. LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CENTEX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Artistry in Homebuilding
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named BUILDING BETTER FOR LESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 29, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 29, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |