USPTO serial 75136351
Serial No. 75136351
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75136351?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
08755 CASTELLBISBAL, Barcelona, ES
08755 CASTELLBISBAL, Barcelona, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARIA A SAVIO
MARIA A SAVIO GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | potato products with or with-out flavor modifiers, namely, potato crisps, potato based snack food, potato chips and French fried potatoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | potato products, with or without flavor modifiers, namely, potato flour; rice-based, corn-based and cereal-based breakfast cereals, sweetened with sugar, honey, syrup, jam, chocolate or any substance modifying the flavor; cereal-based snack food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |