USPTO serial 75136607
NETESCORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETESCORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Antonio, TX
San Antonio, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC B. MEYERTONS
ERIC B MEYERTONS CONLEY ROSE & TAYON PCP O BOX 398AUSTIN, TX 78767-0398UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and related operating system software for use in telecommunications; electronic telecommunications hardware and related operating system software used to transmit and receive multiple sets of information simultaneously over a single transmission line (ie a single telephone line); electronic telecommunications hardware and related operating system software to perform multiplexing functions to combine several sets of signals and send the combined signal over a single transmission line; electronic telecommunications hardware and related operating system software to perform de-multiplexing functions to receive a signal and to separate the signal into its component parts; electronic telecommunications hardware and related operating system software to integrate computer data, voice signals, and/or Local/Wide Area Network (LAN/WAN) data over a single (or set of single) connections from one location to another location by means of various industry available transmission media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 19, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 6, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |