Drawing for TELMEX TOGETHER

USPTO serial 75136662

TELMEX TOGETHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WELLINGTON, THOMAS W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELMEX TOGETHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009telecommunication systems and apparatus, namely, cellular phones and telephone beepers and pagers, telephones, facsimile machines, facsimile modems, telex machines, telephone receivers, telephone wires, telephone transmitters, elbow rests for use with telephones, prepaid telephone cards, magnetically encoded; signal bells; blank audio, and video tapes, optical discs, tape recorders, video recordersACTIVE
035marketing telecommunication services for othersACTIVE
038cellular telephone services, telephone communication services, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals, electronic mail services, electronic store and forward messaging, electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone, paging services, rental of telephones, and facsimile machines, audio and video teleconferencing, domestic, local, and international long distance telephone services and local and international long distance video conference services; telematic services; data and voice telecommunication servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jun 30, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Feb 17, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 21, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jun 7, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 7, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 29, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 2, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 21, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 2, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 30, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 7, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 14, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 8, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 28, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 24, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 31, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance