USPTO serial 75136826
COTELLIGENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 21, 1999
- Examiner
- DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COTELLIGENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH BAILEY-WELLS
DEBORAH BAILEY-WELLS BAKER & MCKENZIE2 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 24SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3823UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | developing computer software applications for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COTELLIGENT, INC
- Other trademarks owned by Cotelligent Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by COTELLIGENT, INC
- Other trademarks owned by Cotelligent Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COTELLIGENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 7, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |