USPTO serial 75136911
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
WESTMOUNT, Quebec H3Z 3C1, CA
ACTON VALE, QUEBEC, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELISABETH A LANGWORTHY
ELISABETH A LANGWORTHY SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP1275 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2415UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | floor coverings, namely, carpets, carpet undercushions, rugs, bath rugs and bath rug accessories, namely, toilet seat covers, toilet tank covers, toilet contour floor mats, bath mats and scatter rugs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |