USPTO serial 75137713
HART & HOLM COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HART & HOLM COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TAWNYA R. WOJCIECHOWSKI
TAWNYA R WOJCIECHOWSKI SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON,LLP650 TOWN CTR DR FL 4COSTA MESA, CA 92626-1993UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Baskets made of metal and iron, for storing firewood, holders for glass mirrors made of steel | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Fire tools, namely, fire irons; kitchen utensils, namely, egg slicers, tablespoons, teaspoons, forks, non-electric knives and non-electric peelers, tongs | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Match holders and teapots made of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Test-Rite Products Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Test-Rite Products Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named HART & HOLM COLLECTION
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |