USPTO serial 75140391
QUARC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUARC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alys Hay
ALYS HAY LAW OFFICE OF ALYS HAYP O BOX 1077CUPERTINO, CA 95015-1077UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | semiconductor devices, namely, chips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |