USPTO serial 75140931
FRUPI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRUPI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jupiter Consumer Products Limited
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn A. Tannehill
LYNN A TANNEHILL LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | candy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |