USPTO serial 75141262
STOP - SOLUTIONS THAT OFFER PROTECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STOP - SOLUTIONS THAT OFFER PROTECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert V. Vickers
ROBERT V VICKERS VICKERS, DANIELS & YOUNGTERMINAL TWR - 20TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | anti-theft devices for motor vehicles, namely, security alarms, steering wheel locks, airbag protectors, kill switches, fuel line cutoffs, hood locks, and backup warning alarms | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 17, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |