USPTO serial 75141430
THE HERBAL MILLENNIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE HERBAL MILLENNIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
American Fork, UT
American Fork, UT
GRAND RAPIDS, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lester K. Essig
LESTER K ESSIG RAY, QUINNEY & NEBEKERP O BOX 45385SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145-0385UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | herbal supplements, vitamins, minerals, herbal extract supplements and dietary supplements; and, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of allergies, hay fever, nasal congestion, asthma, shortness of breath, tightness of chest, wheezing, stress, tension, common cold, fatigue, diarrhea, gas pains, abdominal cramps, stomach distress, intestinal distress, bloating, distension, fullness, pressure, water weight gain, swelling, inflation, fevers, irregularity, constipation, sleep disorders, headaches, motion sickness, nausea, vomiting, low energy, dietary deficiencies, nutritional deficiencies, poor health, blood conditions, circulatory conditions, digestive conditions, premenstrual conditions, menstrual conditions, eye conditions, immune conditions, metabolic conditions, conditions of the joints and conditions associated with aging | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | newsletters, brochures and pamphlets featuring diet, nutrition, health, herbs, vitamins, minerals, herbal extracts, dietary supplements, medications and nutritional supplement product ingredients | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Twin Laboratories Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Twin Laboratories Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ISI BRANDS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named THE HERBAL MILLENNIUM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 20, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |