Drawing for HYDROFORMING JOURNAL

USPTO serial 75141579

HYDROFORMING JOURNAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2076605Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 1, 1997
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with HYDROFORMING JOURNAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kourtney Mulcahy

KOURTNEY MULCAHY HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP222 N LASALLE ST STE 300CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016magazines relating to processes for manufacturing metal products by using fluidsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 20, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2008CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Dec 5, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Nov 22, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 31, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 1, 20048.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Nov 3, 20038.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED
Jul 1, 1997R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 5, 1997CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Apr 29, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 28, 1997IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Apr 11, 1997AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 3, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Feb 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 27, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance