USPTO serial 75142117
ELEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario K1G 3M9, CA
OTTAWA, ONTARIO, CA
Ottawa, Ontario K1G 3M9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT M ANGUS
ROBERT M ANGUS KINNEY & LANGE PATHE KINNEY & LANGE BLDG312 S 3RD STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415-1002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic voting system, namely, a central station having a computer and display screen to record and display election results, and a polling station having a computer and one or more voting terminals having a computer input terminal and a display screen to display electronic ballots and to transmit votes to the central station | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Computing Devices Canada Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL DYNAMICS CANADA LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Computing Devices Canada Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ELEX
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 8, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |