Drawing for CP

USPTO serial 75142360

CP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. G. Horowitz

Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software used in accessing a global computer network and to enable a user to receive electronic mailACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 9, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Dec 27, 1999EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 16, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jun 30, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 14, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 28, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 17, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 1, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 13, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 29, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 1, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 7, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 30, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance