USPTO serial 75142861
FACE FIRST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FACE FIRST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Dennis Moss
Lisa Greenwald-Swire Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | wearing apparel, namely, T-shirts, long sleeve shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, turtlenecks, shorts, baseball hats, toques, socks, underwear, sporting jackets and tank tops; snowboard boots and downhill ski boots | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | sporting equipment, namely, snowboards, downhill skis, downhill ski poles, in-line roller skates, protective elbow pads for athletic use, protective hand pads for athletic use, protective shin pads for athletic use protective knee pads for athletic use, volleyballs, mountain bikes and skateboards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |