Drawing for MALLDIRECT

USPTO serial 75143238

MALLDIRECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HERSHKOWITZ, MERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MALLDIRECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jocelyn G. Bolling

JOCELYN G BOLLING ARNOLD & PORTER555 TWELFTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016catalogs for computer-related products, namely, hardware, software, peripherals, accessories, supplies, books and instructional materialsACTIVE
035telephone-order services, mail-order services, retail-store services and electronic-retailing services, all in the field of computer-related products, namely, computer hardware, software, peripherals, accessories, supplies, books, and instructional materials; disseminating advertising for others and promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of printed publications and via on-line telecommunications networksACTIVE
037installation, maintenance and repair of computers and computer peripheralsACTIVE
042maintenance of computer software; providing information in the field of computer-related products, namely, computer hardware, software, peripherals, accessories, supplies, books, and instructional materials through a global communications networksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 24, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 28, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Feb 24, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 17, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 24, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 9, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 22, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 14, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 24, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 24, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 19, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 19, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 24, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance