Drawing for LIVING IN THE BAY AREA

USPTO serial 75143563

LIVING IN THE BAY AREA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KREHELY, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVING IN THE BAY AREA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas A. Chaikin

DOUGLAS A CHAIKIN PENINSULA IP GROUP16275 S MONTEREY RD STE FMORGAN HILL, CA 95037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Informational publications, namely, pamphlets, brochures, newsletters, journals and magazines relative to adapting to living in the San Francisco Bay area, including relocationACTIVEOct 1, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 21, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 21, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jan 13, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Oct 16, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Mar 27, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 17, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 15, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 16, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance