USPTO serial 75143690
ECCO BELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 1997
- Examiner
- GRUNDY, JUDITH A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ECCO BELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wayne, NJ
Wayne, NJ
WEST ORANGE, NJ
MONTCLAIR, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics, namely, mascara, eyeshadow, blush, lipstick, foundation, skin care preparations, namely, body lotion, creams, toner, masks, sunscreen; hair care preparations, namely, shampoo and conditioner, styling gel, body oils, massage cream, non-medicated lip balm, cologne, bath gel, soap, non-medicated bath salts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by E.B. Botanicals Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by E.B. Botanicals Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NEW EARTH BEAUTY LLC
- Other trademarks owned by E.B. Botanicals Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ECCO BELLA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 16, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 16, 2020 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 6, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2020 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |