USPTO serial 75144135
NULOGIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NULOGIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Tognino
ALEXANDER TOGNINO IBM CORPN CASTLE DRARMONK, NY 10504UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | technical support services, namely, repairing systems and computer peripheral equipment for corporations, original equipment manufacturers, computer brokers and leasing companies | ABANDONED | Apr 22, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 27, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 18, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |