USPTO serial 75145531
IDSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH G. BURGESS
JOSEPH G BURGESS BLISS MCGLYNN, PC2075 W BIG BEAVER RDSTE 600TROY, MI 48084Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, local and long distance telephone services, delivery of voice, text, facsimile, video and data messages by electronic transmission; electronic mail and voice mail and messaging services; paging services; computer aided transmission of messages and images; audio and video teleconference services; private line voice, text, facsimile, video and data telephone services; integrated services digital network --ISDN-- telecommunication services; transmission of voice and data via satellite; provision of telecommunications connections to a global communications network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |