USPTO serial 75145698
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Warrenville, IL
Warrenville, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WIN WEHRLI
WIN WEHRLI WIN WEHRLI ATTORNEY AT LAW PC104 S PKWY DRNAPERVILLE, IL 60540-4355UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | full line of surgical, medical and dental instruments and apparatus | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 23, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 27, 1998 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jul 10, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |