USPTO serial 75146845
SIZZLERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIZZLERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
El Segundo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELE L. McSHANE
MICHELE L MCSHANE MATTEL, INCLAW DEPT - M1-1518333 CONTINENTAL BLVDEL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-5012Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toy vehicles and toy vehicle sets and accessories for the foregoing | ABANDONED | Oct 24, 1969 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 1998 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |