USPTO serial 75146906
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY
New York, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT V. BEECHERT
SCOTT V BEECHERT OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLYONE CITICORP CTR153 E 53RD ST 26TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin care products, namely, foaming facial cleanser, skin toner, eye makeup remover, moisturizing lotion, moisturizing creme, soothing moisture mask, clarifying mask, eye mask, eye cream, night cream, wrinkle removing skin care preparations, body lotion, anti-aging cream, sun block cream, sun screen cream, suntanning cream, facial exfoliating preparations, lip treatment, tinted moisturizer, self tanning preparations, color cosmetics, namely, foundations, concealer, loose face and body powder, compact face powder, powder blush, creme blush, eyeshadow, creme eye shadow, eyeliner, mascara, eyebrow powder, eyebrow gloss and grooming preparations, lipstick, lip pencils, lip gloss, nail polish, nail base and top coat polishes, and lip balm; fragrances, namely, eau de toilette, eau de parfum, and perfume; and bath products, namely, bath and shower gel, fragrant bath soap, perfumed body creme, body exfoliating preparations, bath beads, bath oil, body oil, and body and hair shampoo | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jan 27, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |