USPTO serial 75146960
THE HIPPO CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE HIPPO CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | mens, ladies and childrens clothing, including pants, shorts, overalls, skirts, shirts, jackets, vests, dresses; sportwear and jeanswear, namely, shirts, blouse, tie pants, sweatpants, shorts, skirts, jackets, vests, hats, overalls, visors, socks, sweaters, sweatshirts, coats, wind-resistant jackets, scarves and shoes | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |